A Founder Essay
What Does Owning Your Story Mean?
The eulogy exercise asks what people will say about you when you are gone. I have always asked something harder: what did you actually do with the time you had?
By ianka fleerackers · 26 May 2026
There is a well-known exercise in personal development circles. You are asked to imagine your own funeral and write the speech you hope someone would give. The idea is that the answer reveals what truly matters.
It does not.
Or rather — it reveals only one thing. And it is always the same thing. How good you were to the people around you. How much you gave. How deeply you loved. How selflessly you lived.
I do not dispute that this matters. Research confirms it: on their deathbed, people report that relationships and human connection are what remains when everything else falls away. The rest — career, status, money, achievement — gets pushed aside.
But I have never been able to accept this as the full picture. Because if it were — if being a good person to the people closest to you were truly the only thing that counts — then why build anything at all? Why spend a lifetime working, creating, building companies, writing books, developing expertise? If the eulogy at the end reduces your entire professional life to a footnote, then what was it for?
Taken to its logical conclusion, the eulogy exercise makes most of what we do irrelevant. We might as well return to an agrarian society — tend the land, live in community, trade what we grow. At least then the relationship between life and labour would be honest.
I find the exercise itself a comfortable cliché dressed as depth. No one tells the truth at a funeral — and you will never be confronted with the answer, because you are not there to hear it. It is a thought experiment designed to feel profound while demanding nothing.
A different question
I have always asked a different question.
Not: what will people say about me when I am gone? But: what did I actually do with what I had? Did I use it — every talent, every opportunity, every year? Did I build something that held together across the chapters of my life? Not for applause. Not for legacy in the abstract. But because this was the one life I was given, and I refused to leave it unlived.
That question does not produce comfort. It produces accountability.
It has governed my life since I was eleven years old.
What I saw at eleven
As a child, I watched my talented, entrepreneurial mother get overtaken by illness. Her health collapsed, and with it, her life. Not gradually — decisively. There was no more room for ambition. No more place in society. No income to earn, no projects to pursue, no ordinary pleasures to enjoy. Not because she lacked the will, but because her body would not allow it.
The impact on our family has been underestimated and unacknowledged to this day.
During one of those periods when I was caring for her — I must have been eleven — something crystallised. Not as an insight. As a decision.
I decided that I would use everything I had. Every talent, large or small, whether it led to success or not. I would not wait until retirement to live. The idea of postponing life to some future reward had become absurd to me. I had seen, in real time, what happens when that future does not arrive. Wasted life. Wasted opportunities. Lost not to bad luck alone, but to the assumption that there would always be more time.
I thought: I live once. I had better make my life my own.
And I became convinced — I still am — that if you do this with integrity, it is not selfish. It is the opposite. You come into a kind of force that naturally has an impact on the lives of others. Not because you aimed for impact, but because you stopped performing a life you did not choose.
Three careers. One through-line.
The course of my own life brought me to the terrain of authority and public visibility earlier than most.
My first career was as an actress. Through the success of several television series and award nominations, I became a public figure in a country where fame scales differently — where a million weekly viewers in a nation of eleven million means you are recognised everywhere. The struggles that came with that, and the expertise I built navigating them, were immense. I learned what it means to own your story in the most literal, public, unforgiving sense: how to choose between projects that bring popularity, money, artistic interest, or reputational risk. What to say in interviews. What to withhold. How to ensure you are not lived by others. How to prevent people from flattening you into a version that is easier to consume.
That was the first pillar of what would later become Own Your Story — though it did not have a name yet.
The second thread started just as early. In my twenties, I chose differentiation. Multiple revenue models. Multiple professional identities. Not only out of financial necessity, but because I believed it was a smarter model for a life. If autonomy is one of your values, you do not want to be entirely dependent on one employer, one industry, one income stream. But it went further than risk distribution. Each entity I built also served the larger idea of what I wanted my life to have been about. This was never a bucket list. Every idea had a plan, a form, an entity behind it. Work, for me, was never simply about earning a living. It is something you spend forty hours a week on. That is a great deal of time. I chose to give it a place in my life that goes beyond bringing in money.
And then there is the link with health. Having a mother who fell seriously ill young was a lifelong lesson. Your chances shrink dramatically when your health is compromised. So health always came first — before work, and certainly before earning. Now that the world has discovered the concept of longevity, there is finally language for what I have practised my entire life: health first, purpose in work.
The pattern I could finally name
The advantage of being in your fifties is perspective. You can look back and see patterns that were invisible while you were living them.
I recognised the pattern of how I had always worked. Across every career, every entity, every reinvention, the same three movements kept repeating.
I developed wisdom — not as abstract knowledge, but as judgment earned through experience, mistakes, and time. The capacity to act from understanding rather than react from conditioning.
I took ownership — of my choices, my direction, my professional identity. Full accountability for how I was known and what I stood for. Not waiting for permission. Not adapting to someone else's definition.
And I built a narrative around each chapter — so that my work could be communicated with the world. Not as marketing, but as authorship. A through-line that made disparate things coherent.
Ownership. Wisdom. Narrative. O.W.N.® The framework did not come from theory. It came from looking at thirty years of decisions and recognising the architecture that held them together.
What owning your story actually means
Owning your story is not a metaphor for self-confidence. It is not a softer way of saying personal branding. It is not about finding your voice or stepping into your power or any of the hollow constructions that have colonised this territory.
Owning your story means taking full authorship of your professional life — of what you build, how you are known, and the narrative that connects the two across time.
It means that when you stand on a stage, or publish a piece of writing, or make a strategic decision about your career, you do it from a position you have examined, articulated, and deliberately chosen. Not from a position you drifted into. Not from a position someone else assigned to you.
I built Own Your Story because I saw the same pattern everywhere. Talented professionals — founders, experts, leaders — who had done serious work but whose public standing had not caught up with who they had actually become. Or who were building across multiple companies and ideas but could not explain how it all fit together. The authority was real. The narrative was missing.
The inflection point — that moment when the gap between private substance and public standing becomes untenable — is where OYS begins for those building public authority. It is a point of expansion and deepening, not a point of starting over.
The Longevity Career — that longer arc of a portfolio career, an octopus of entities and ideas, a life achievement in construction — is where OYS works for those who have always built in multiple directions. Finding the through-line. Making it legible. Giving it a narrative architecture that holds across decades and reinventions.
Both paths rest on the same foundation: O.W.N.® Ownership of direction. Wisdom accumulated through living. Narrative as the connective tissue that makes a body of work coherent to the world.
The harder question
I do not think about eulogies. I think about what I will have built.
Not in the achievement-as-trophy sense. In the sense of: did I use what I had? Did I make my work my own? Did I build something that held together — across the careers, the reinventions, the decades?
That is the question Own Your Story exists to answer. Not for me — that work is done and ongoing. For the founders, the experts, the builders who recognise that same restlessness. Who know they are not building a career. They are authoring a life.
The eulogy exercise asks what people will say about you when you are gone. I have always asked something harder: what did you actually do with the time you had?
About the author
ianka fleerackers is the founder of Own Your Story and the author of the O.W.N.® framework. She works at the intersection of humanities, technology and business — with founders, experts, and leaders at an inflection point, or building toward a life achievement. The entry point into the practice is the Authority Mindset Audit.
Take the Authority Mindset Audit →