For teams

Presenting to senior leadership

From knowing the file to a sharp decision request

The board and senior management judge proposals from their responsibility for the whole organisation. An investment, a recommendation or a project is weighed against strategy, budget, other priorities and possible risks.

Presenting to this group therefore calls for different preparation than a briefing for clients or colleagues. You know your file — but how do you translate that knowledge into the trade-off that has to be made at the table?

In this training you learn to turn what you know into a sharp recommendation and an explicit decision request: what does leadership need to decide, why now, which trade-offs have been made, and what exactly are you asking for?

Practical training · Full day · Dutch or English

Discuss your question →

Little time, high stakes: your recommendation has to hold

Board members usually have a broad view of the organisation, but they do not necessarily know the background of every file. During your presentation they need to grasp quickly how your proposal fits the areas they are responsible for.

A long history or a chronological report does not always help. Without a clear recommendation, people are left searching for what your information means.

The questions at the table are often predictable:

  • What do you recommend, and which decision are you asking for?
  • What does this mean for cost, capacity, risk or strategy?
  • Which alternatives have you considered?
  • What happens if the decision is postponed?

When you take these questions into your preparation, you can choose more precisely which information is needed. It also becomes easier to answer when the conversation takes a different order than your slides.

From informing to deciding

When you have put a lot of work into research or a project, it is natural to build your presentation the same way: first the reason, then the process, then the findings and finally the conclusion.

For colleagues who want to understand the file in depth, that can be a useful order. The board and senior management often need your conclusion earlier, so they can place the evidence.

That is why this training starts from the question you are putting to leadership. You learn to state your recommendation early and then explain what it rests on.

Your presentation gains a clear direction. Your analysis still matters, but you organise it around the decision that has to be made.

Calm and authority under pressure

Questions and interruptions are part of these conversations. A board member wants to test an assumption, probe a risk or know why another option was dropped.

The hierarchy can make that exchange more tense. You may explain more than needed, water down your advice, or feel you must have an answer straight away.

In the training you practise responding calmly and on substance. You learn to understand the question properly, give a focused answer and return to your line of reasoning. You also practise saying that information is missing or that a point needs further work.

Your authority rests on your knowledge of the file, a clear trade-off and care in what you do and do not claim. You do not need an instant answer to everything to stand firm in the conversation.

What you learn

  • Reducing a proposal to a sharp recommendation and an explicit decision request.
  • Linking your content to the organisation's strategic priorities.
  • Building a presentation from the conclusion, with the evidence the decision needs.
  • Explaining choices, alternatives, risks and uncertainties clearly.
  • Deciding which details are needed straight away and which you keep in reserve for questions.
  • Answering critical questions precisely and staying calm when interrupted.
  • Delivering advice with authority, without making yourself smaller or over-justifying.

Working with presentations from your own practice

Beforehand, we agree with the client which situations within the organisation need attention.

During the training we look at which decision or trade-off is on the table and which information it requires. You rework your opening and structure and practise a short excerpt.

Other participants ask questions from different responsibilities, such as finance, operations or risk. ianka gives focused feedback on your reasoning, structure and delivery. Then you present again and apply what the first round revealed.

Who is it for?

For professionals, managers, project leads, experts and advisers who present proposals to the board, senior management or a board of directors.

The training is relevant when you are asking for budget, capacity or a mandate, proposing a strategic project or need to back up a recommendation. You know your file and want to align your presentation better with the trade-offs the decision-makers face.

What you take away

You leave with a sharper opening and structure. Your recommendation and decision request are more clearly worded, with evidence that matches what leadership has to assess.

You have practised answers to important questions and know which information you explain straight away and which details you keep in reserve. A practical worksheet helps you prepare future board presentations the same way.

Practical

Duration
A full day.
Location
At your premises or at a location we agree on.
Language
Dutch or English.
Group size
Tailored so everyone gets enough personal practice time.
Price
On proposal after a first conversation, depending on group size, location and tailoring.

The first step

Which proposals do your people need to present to leadership?

Tell us who presents, what kind of proposals they bring and what is not working well today. After a short conversation, you will receive a proposal for a training built on examples from your own practice.

Discuss your question →